<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Shawn Stratton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shawnstratton.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shawnstratton.info</link>
	<description>PHP Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Patches by Symptoms Of Low Vitamin D</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnstratton.info/patches/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Symptoms Of Low Vitamin D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shawnstratton.info/?page_id=45#comment-63</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Symptoms Of Low Vitamin D...&lt;/strong&gt;

If you have been struggeling with sinus infections for a while you now how iritating it can be....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Symptoms Of Low Vitamin D&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>If you have been struggeling with sinus infections for a while you now how iritating it can be&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accesors and Religion by Software Development &#124; Pelshoff.com</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnstratton.info/accesors-and-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Development &#124; Pelshoff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 09:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shawnstratton.info/?p=183#comment-62</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;$oop-&gt;consistency = false;...&lt;/strong&gt;

There are various ways to access the properties of an object. Is one way better than another? What constitutes a better way? Why should anyone care?﻿...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>$oop-&gt;consistency = false;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There are various ways to access the properties of an object. Is one way better than another? What constitutes a better way? Why should anyone care?﻿&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accesors and Religion by Jblotus</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnstratton.info/accesors-and-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Jblotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shawnstratton.info/?p=183#comment-61</guid>
		<description>assuming you are in control of the class, what is stopping you from refactoring a large class into smaller chunks? large classes tend to be a huge warning sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>assuming you are in control of the class, what is stopping you from refactoring a large class into smaller chunks? large classes tend to be a huge warning sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accesors and Religion by Shawn Stratton&#8217;s Blog: Accesors and Religion &#124; Scripting4You Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnstratton.info/accesors-and-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Stratton&#8217;s Blog: Accesors and Religion &#124; Scripting4You Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 21:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shawnstratton.info/?p=183#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] a new post to his blog talking about a topic he calls &#8220;flame bait&#8221; &#8211; the use of accessors in PHP applications (getters and setters) to access class properties.   Objects have prop­er­ties which some­times [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a new post to his blog talking about a topic he calls &#8220;flame bait&#8221; &#8211; the use of accessors in PHP applications (getters and setters) to access class properties.   Objects have prop­er­ties which some­times [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accesors and Religion by Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnstratton.info/accesors-and-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shawnstratton.info/?p=183#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I still find having getter and setter methods cleaner than using __set and __get functions.  Just because a class has a lot of access functions is not a clear indicator of refactoring.  Sometimes classes do need to be large, sometimes they do need to handle a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still find having getter and setter methods cleaner than using __set and __get functions.  Just because a class has a lot of access functions is not a clear indicator of refactoring.  Sometimes classes do need to be large, sometimes they do need to handle a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

